005). These differences between
activities were found to be statistically significant (see Table 3). General visits to rocky shores were also seen to have positive effects on marine awareness regarding the five different topics, with the most perceived change in overall biology of rocky shores and the general human induced threats to the shore (Table 4). Visitors’ awareness on all of the topics was perceived to improve (above the no change value of 3, all ps < 0.001). For the environmental risk variable, a mixed-ANOVA was used to examine whether there were any statistically significant differences between the two samples. As shown in Table 2, the coastal experts and coastal users responded similarly for 14 activities. There was a statistical discrepancy between the two samples Talazoparib ic50 for cycling, with the coastal users perceiving this activity as having a greater risk on the environment than coastal experts. Despite this difference, both groups agreed that this activity was associated with the smallest risk compared to the other activities. Consequently, generally both coastal experts and coastal users perceived the impact on the environment of different activities similarly. LDE225 concentration As shown in Table 2,
the open-ended comments did differ in their focus on littering and lack of rock pooling ethics. Forty eight percent of coastal experts’ comments related to the lack of rock pooling ethics, whilst only 21% of the users’ comments related to this theme. In contrast, 54% of coastal users’ comments related to the litter theme, whilst only 26% of coastal experts’ comments related to this. A chi-square analysis found that the two samples significantly this website differed in the focus of their comments, χ2 = 12.93, df = 2, p = 0.002. Regarding perceived impacts on the visitor,
both samples had similar ratings for the mood effects for each activity (Table 3). For the excitement ratings, there was a small effect that coastal experts generally saw activities as more exciting than the coastal users. For the majority of activities, both samples were similar in their perceptions; however, three statistical differences emerged. Both coastal experts and coastal users perceived that visitors would feel excited after snorkelling, crabbing or rock pooling, but the coastal experts perceived that visitors would experience a slightly greater level of excitement. Coastal users were slightly more optimistic in the marine awareness benefits, as they believed visitors would leave with greater marine awareness than the coastal experts did (Table 4). Specifically, coastal users felt that visitors’ awareness regarding the general human threats to the shore would increase slightly more than coastal experts’ perceptions.