01 × 108 m3 and 7 32 × 108 m3, respectively The results indicate

01 × 108 m3 and 7.32 × 108 m3, respectively. The results indicate that water consumption of the midstream region has been growing significantly, and the abrupt increase started in the early 1980s. Streamflow difference

between Yingluoxia and Zhengyixia stations is characterized by four distinct stages according to the variation of the five year moving average (see Fig. 8), namely, stage 1: steadily decreasing (1957–1974); stage 2: steadily increasing (1975–1999); stage 3: variably decreasing selleck compound (2000–2005); and stage 4: variably increasing (2006–2012). It is still difficult to give a clear explanation to the decreasing trend for stage 1, but it is possible that the dry period, coupled with the absence of an effective water conservancy project, is the reason. The increasing trend for water consumption in the middle HRB during stage 2 is obviously due to the socioeconomic development. After the initiation of the EWDP on the main stream of Heihe River in 2000, water consumption was controlled in stage 3. During the third stage, to ensure water supply to the lower HRB in low-flow years, less water is used in the middle HRB such that a valley point can be seen in 2004. In stage 4, water consumption has been rising again, Fluorouracil although

water use has been restricted due to the EWDP. The EWDP sets rules for the minimal water release to the downstream through the Zhengyixia station but not the amount of water available in the middle HRB. It causes more water to be used Rebamipide in the middle HRB during the wet years, and explains the rising water consumption in stage 4. Drought and wetness is the dominant factor of water consumption in the middle HRB after the implementation of EWDP. In contrast, water released to the downstream through the Zhengyixia station is relatively stable.

The annual precipitation and temperature time series and their MK test results in the upper, middle and lower HRB for the last 53 years (1960–2012) are shown in Fig. 9. The graphs on the left in Fig. 9 are for precipitation data while those on the right are for temperature data. For precipitation, it can be seen that there has been a significant increasing trend in the upstream areas (with MK test Z-value of 2.35), a less prominent increasing trend in the midstream areas (with MK test Z-value of 1.63) and essentially no increasing trend in the downstream areas (with MK test Z-value of 0.69). Decadal variability of precipitation indicates that there is a most obvious wet period for the upstream areas during 2003–2012, but none for the midstream and downstream areas. For temperature, the MK test results show that the climate of the HRB has been getting warmer during the last 53 years. There was an oscillation of the mean annual temperature before 1997, but thereafter the annual temperature was always higher than the long-term mean temperature. The year of 1968 was the coldest year for the last 53 years.

This entry was posted in Antibody. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>