A lung-protective strategy has been recommended in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome [17]. This approach involves among other components use of lower tidal volume and allowing “permissive hypercarbia”.
However, while avoiding excessively high, non-physiological tidal volume would likely be beneficial in mechanically ventilated obstetric patients, pregnant women were excluded from studies on the acute respiratory distress syndrome. Hypercarbia is generally well tolerated by non-obstetric, mechanically ventilated patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome and has been demonstrated to possibly have systemic organ-protective effects [42]. However, the balance between avoiding
hypercarbia in mechanically ventilated pregnant patients and the adverse pulmonary and Epacadostat supplier systemic consequences associated with overly aggressive augmented ventilation have not been determined in this population and require further study. Among women with PASS developing prior to delivery, prompt initiation of fetal monitoring and consideration selleck compound of timing and type of delivery should be integral parts of care. However, delivery was not shown to improve maternal outcomes among septic women [43]. The details of fetal care in women with severe sepsis have been described elsewhere [25]. While data on the general elements of care of severe sepsis in the general population and in PASS patients have been readily accessible to clinicians (in developed countries), many challenges remain in the care of PASS. Multiple investigators have described prevalent substandard care in women with MycoClean Mycoplasma Removal Kit PASS. Kramer et al. [30] have found that among women
who died due to severe sepsis, a substandard care analysis showed delayed in diagnosis and/or therapy in 38% of patients. In the report of the confidential enquiry on maternal deaths in the UK, Cantwell et al. [44] reported that “substandard care” occurred in 69% of patients. The VRT752271 nmr authors recommended “going back to the basics”, including among other recommendations, mandatory, audited training of all clinical staff in the identification and initial management of pregnancy-associated sepsis. Because of the rarity of PASS, with an estimate of up to around 2,000 events per year in the US (when using the highest population-based incidence data to date [32]), most clinicians and hospitals are unlikely to encounter even a single patient with PASS in a given year. The rarity of PASS, coupled with its demonstrated risk of a rapidly fatal course, underscores the ongoing challenges in assuring timely recognition and care of these high-risk patients. Resource Utilization in Pregnancy-Associated Severe Sepsis Patients with PASS are often managed in an ICU [27, 30, 31, 35]. Kramer et al. [30] reported ICU utilization in 79% of their patients with severe sepsis.