Confidence intervals, especially for season 2, were sufficiently narrow to rule out a large linear effect of HI titer. The findings presented here must be reconciled with the long-standing view that HI titers correlate with protection,3, 5, 25, 26 and 27 and with evidence that
HI antibodies block virus binding to host cell membrane receptors, correlate with neutralization in tissue and egg culture, and transfer protection in mice.3, 5 and 28 An important factor to consider is that the challenge studies that first established a correlation between HI titer and protection did not include H1N1 strains3, 27 and 29 and many subsequent studies have looked at HI antibodies www.selleckchem.com/products/dorsomorphin-2hcl.html induced by inactivated subunit vaccines given intramuscularly rather than by natural infection via the respiratory route.7, 25, 26 and 30 There is substantial evidence that inactivated vaccine and live virus infections induce different antibodies. It is particularly well established that intranasal live attenuated influenza vaccines (LAIV) provide equivalent protection to inactivated vaccine although HI titers are invariably lower and underestimate efficacy.7, 29, 31, 32, 33, 34 and 35 Neutralizing antibody titer, influenza specific airway IgA, influenza specific see more IgG + B cell frequency, or combinations of these factors correlate better with LAIV efficacy.33, 34, 35 and 36 Nevertheless, a number of natural infection cohorts have demonstrated
correlations between homologous HI titers and protection against H1N1 infection. In some of these studies participants had very little prior exposure to natural H1N1 infection, as in a study of boarding school students just 3 years after H1N1 re-emerged.37 In Celecoxib others immunity may have been shaped by vaccination, as in two cohort studies that enrolled adults soon after the 2009 pandemic started.38 and 39 At least 10% of participants in these cohorts had received seasonal influenza vaccine, and the proportions
with detectable pandemic H1N1 HI antibody at baseline was at least 2-fold higher than in the present study. Another study found a significant effect of baseline titer on pandemic H1N1 infection in adults that had not had influenza vaccine in the preceding season of whom 10–15% had already been infected at baseline.40 In the present study cohort participants had never been vaccinated against influenza, and only 6% had a detectable pandemic H1N1 antibody titer at baseline, most of whom has titers of just 10. This indicates that the association between HI antibodies and protection against H1N1 may vary depending on the population or strains involved and timing of investigation in relation to antigenic drift or shift. Numerous other studies of the 1977 and 2009 H1N1 pandemics found that infection risk was associated with age independent of HI antibody titers, and suggest that this phenomenon is due to broadly neutralizing, non-HI antibodies.