For each dimension, each participant received a summed score. For Factor 1, participants scored between 0 and 12 (based on Factor 1 being determined by three items) and positive agreement was indicated by a score of 9 or more. For Factor 2, participants scored between 0 and 16 (based on Factor 2 being determined by four items) and positive agreement was indicated by a score of 12 or more. For Factor 3, positive agreement was indicated by a score of 9 or more as for Factor 1. Table 4 summarises mean factor scores for the total sample as well as metropolitan and regional pharmacists. The difference in mean scores for Factors 1 and 2 between
metropolitan and regional pharmacists was not statistically significant. However, there was a statistically significant difference in mean scores for Factor 3 between metropolitan and KU-60019 regional pharmacists (P = 0.02), indicating that regional pharmacists were more likely to see their role encompassing counselling about asthma control. Individual items were also analysed to identify those items most commonly perceived by pharmacists to be Selumetinib datasheet part of their role in asthma management. The proportion of pharmacists
indicating agreement to each individual item, to each factor and all items relating to their role are shown in Table 5. Of the 17 potential barriers presented to participants, each one was considered to have at least some impact by over half the participants (Table 6). The four major barriers identified by over 95% of pharmacists impacting on their ability to provide specific asthma services included pharmacist’s lack of time and
patients’ perception that they are already well cared for by the doctor, lack of time and lack of asthma knowledge. Of the six most commonly oxyclozanide identified barriers, five of them related to ‘patient factors’. Interestingly, lack of financial incentive (63%) and conflict between professional and commercial interests (59%) were not perceived by pharmacists as having a great impact on their ability to provide specific asthma services. There was no significant difference in mean ratings between metropolitan and regional pharmacists. Overall, sixty-seven (69%) pharmacists agreed (57% agreed, 12% strongly agreed) that they had good inter-professional contact with other health professionals in the care of their patients with asthma (item 28) but 67 (69%) agreed (47% agreed, 22% strongly agreed) that they would like to have more such contact (item 29). There were no significant differences in the mean ratings between metropolitan versus regional pharmacists. Community pharmacists perceived their role in asthma management along three major dimensions: ‘patient self-management’, ‘medication use’ and ‘asthma control’, with regional pharmacists perceiving themselves to have a slightly broader role compared to metropolitan pharmacists.