“Objective: Baby oil is commonly used to soften

ea


“Objective: Baby oil is commonly used to soften

ear wax in order to aid its removal. The aim of this study was to determine the potential ototoxicity of baby oil.

Method: A prospective controlled animal study was conducted using ten chinchillas with normal hearing function. Each had bilateral myringotomies. One ear was randomly assigned to receive 1 ml of baby oil while the other ear received an equal volume of 0.45% NaCl. Distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs) and Auditory Brainstem Response (ABR) measurements were recorded at baseline CP-868596 manufacturer (post myringotomy and pre application of product) and on days 5 and 15 after application. Two months after application of baby oil, the cochleae were processed for light microscopy and qualitative comparisons were made between the cochleae of both control and experimental ears.

Results: There was no statistically significant difference in DPOAE between experimental and control ears at 5 and 15 days after treatment. ABR results did not reveal ototoxicity at days 5 and 15 post treatment.

None of the animals developed facial paralysis or any signs of vestibular toxicity. There were no overt mucosal changes in the middle ear of the ears exposed to baby oil compared to the control ears. Light microscopy showed comparable features in the organ of Corti, stria vascularis, spiral ligament and the spiral ganglion cells of both groups of cochleae.

Conclusion: Baby oil did not produce selleck kinase inhibitor ototoxic effects when applied ototopically in chinchillas with non-intact tympanic membrane. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.”
“Stroke ON-01910 nmr in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) is often associated with substantial morbidity and

mortality. Oral anticoagulation remains the first-line approach to stroke prevention in such individuals; however, for a considerable proportion of patients, traditional treatment using warfarin is limited by a number of factors, such as the inconvenience of frequent therapeutic monitoring and the risk of haemorrhage. The development of new oral anticoagulants with improved efficacy and safety profiles has provided viable options for oral anticoagulation therapy in patients with nonvalvular (nonrheumatic AF). Nonetheless, in patients who have an increased risk of major haemorrhage, a nonpharmacological approach to antithrombotic therapy remains an attractive alternative. The left atrial appendage (LAA) has been found to be the source of >90% of thrombi in patients with nonvalvular AF; thus, prevention of thrombus formation via transcatheter mechanical LAA occlusion is a novel therapeutic target for stroke prevention in this patient population. In this Review, we present the rationale for LAA occlusion in patients with AF, the available occlusion devices and their clinical evidence to date. We also discuss the roles of various imaging techniques in device implantation and the management strategy for associated procedural complications.

This entry was posted in Antibody. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>