The contrast maps for group and regression analyses were threshol

The contrast maps for group and regression analyses were thresholded at P < 0.001 without correction for multiple comparisons, and the extent threshold for significant clusters was set to 40 voxels. We were aware that the application of an uncorrected threshold would

certainly limit the impact of possible results as it increases the probability of false positive findings. To justify the selection of an uncorrected threshold in our analyses, we provide the following issues. Taking into account the results of previous PD0332991 purchase findings in DTI studies in ADHD (Ashtari et al., 2005; Makris et al., 2008), we only expected discrete microstructural abnormalities in ADHD that may not be detectable adopting a corrected threshold with

a much higher risk of false negative findings. In this context, it is noteworthy that the only published voxel-based DTI study in ADHD – like a large number of imaging studies in the neuropsychiatric field – also used an uncorrected (P < 0.001) LY2835219 order threshold (Ashtari et al., 2005). T1-weighted templates were then overlaid with the statistically significant SPM clusters using MRIcro software for graphical presentation in neurological convention. The MRI atlas of human WM (Mori et al., 2005) was used for the identification of subcortical WM structures. The MNI coordinates and t-statistic of the peak voxel, the cluster size and the corresponding anatomical structures were determined (Mori et al., 2005). The mean FA and MD values of the peak voxel resulting from the voxel-based group analysis as well as from the voxel-based regression analyses were correlated with the measures for attentional performance (ADHD score), impulsivity (number of commission errors) and total ADHD symptomatology (BADDS score). Significance was set to P < 0.05 (uncorrected) for these regression analyses. Gender, age and IQ did not differ between groups (Table 1). Among patients, 16 (43%) were regular smokers, compared with 6 (18%) regular smokers in the control group. As expected,

MRIP we found significant group differences in ADHD semi-quantitative measures WURS and BADDS (Table 1). The ADHD score (TOVA) was significantly lower in patients with ADHD (−4.4 ± 5.7) than in controls (1.7 ± 2.0). RT was significantly longer and RT variability was significantly higher in patients with ADHD (Table 1). Patients’ performance was significantly poorer in the TMT-A, in the TMT-B, in the AVLT and in the WMS-R (Table 1). In the remaining neuropsychological tests (MWT, WCST), performance in the patient group was also poorer, but the differences did not achieve statistical significance (Table 1). As the tests examined different categories of neuropsychological performance and executive function, we did not use a Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons.

This entry was posted in Antibody. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>