Two important
publications in 2007 provided a more comprehensive physicochemical and in vitro biological characterization of these nanoparticles [36] and examined their biodistribution and pharmacokinetics in mice [41], respectively. A summary of the characterization findings is provided in Table 5. Notably, a combination of multiple experimental methods, including multiangle laser light scattering (MALS), allowed determination of nanoparticle stoichiometry—a 70nm nanoparticle contains an average of ~10,000 CAL101 molecules, ~4000 AD-PEG molecules, ~100 AD-PEG-Tf molecules, Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical and ~2,000 siRNA molecules. In addition, it was shown that the net ratio of positive (from CAL101) to negative (from siRNA) Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical charges in the nanoparticles is ~1, implying that all additional CAL101 in the formulation remains as “free” (non-nanoparticle-contained). Since it is free
components that are likely responsible for toxicity seen as high nanoparticles doses in animals (as discussed below), this Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical finding suggests a strategy for potentially improving the therapeutic window of these formulations via removal/reduction in the levels of free components. To further examine the in vivo properties of these nanoparticles, positron emission tomography (PET)/computerized tomography (CT) was employed to monitor whole-body biodistribution kinetics and tumor localization of nanoparticles while concurrently using bioluminescence selleck chemicals imaging to measure the ability of the nanoparticles (which contained antiluciferase siRNA) Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical to downregulate their target in luciferase-expressing tumors. Comparing Tf-containing (targeted) versus non-Tf-containing (nontargeted) analogue Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical formulations, it was revealed that both formulations exhibited similar biodistribution and tumor localization as measured by PET; however, compartmental modeling showed that a primary advantage of targeted nanoparticles
was associated with processes involved in cellular uptake by tumor cells, rather than overall tumor accumulation. Thus, as has been discussed before [40], the term “internalization ligand” might well replace “targeting ligand” to describe the role of Tf in these nanoparticles. In addition, as Sodium butyrate had been shown in the EFT work described above, only targeted nanoparticles in this study were able to achieve a significant reduction in the expression level of the gene target in tumor cells. Table 5 Selected physicochemical properties of siRNA-containing, RONDEL-based nanoparticles. 7. RONDEL Translation: Calando Pharmaceuticals and CALAA-01 Founded in 2005, Calando Pharmaceuticals’ mission is to develop drug delivery solutions to unlock the promise of RNAi therapeutics.