00%), (Graph 9 and Table Gefitinib price 9). Similar study was carried out by Bansode et al.7 came up with results contradictory to our study that contained few palatal expansion cases. The palatal expansion cases in the study done by Bansode et al. showed changes only in the length of palatal rugae. The stability of the first and second palatal rugae is limited and dependent on the type of orthodontic treatment. As stated by Peavy and Kendrick ‘the closer the rugae are to the teeth, the more prone they are to stretch in the direction that their associated teeth move.’21 These findings are also consistent with those of Van der Linden and Almeida et al.20,21 In Palatal expansion cases there will be a significant increase in arch perimeter
subsequently causing changes in the shape, size and position of rugae patterns. Extraction of premolars creates a large space for distal retraction of the maxillary anterior teeth, which changes the positions of rugae.14 The third rugae appeared fairly stable in all measurements and their position near the molar region away from the distal retraction of the
anterior teeth may contribute to the lack of change.22-26 These results were consistent with Schwarze et al and Paevy and Kendrick.21,27 They concluded that more posterior the rugae are, lesser susceptible are they to changes with tooth movement. Most significant changes were observed in cases involving both extraction and palatal expansion, whereas in cases of non-extraction the changes in rugae pattern remain unexplained. Graph 1 Comparison of extraction, non-extraction and expansion with respect to right side length. Graph 4 Comparison of pre- and post-treatment with respect to length values in three groups
i.e., extraction, non-extraction and palatal expansion group in left side. Graph 5 Comparison of three groups with respect to shape of rugae patterns in pre-treatment at right side. Graph 8 Comparison of three groups with respect to shape of rugae patterns in post-treatment at left side. Graph 9 Comparison of three groups with respect to status changes. Graph 2 Comparison of extraction, non-extraction and palatal expansion with respect to left side length. Graph 3 Comparison of pre- and post-treatment with respect to length values Dacomitinib in three groups i.e., extraction, non-extraction and palatal expansion group in right side. Graph 6 Comparison of three groups with respect to shape of rugae patterns in post-treatment at right side. Graph 7 Comparison of three groups with respect to shape of rugae patterns in pre-treatment at left side. Conclusion Palatal rugae pattern is unique to an individual and it can therefore be used in establishing identity which can be an adjunct in forensic medicine provided antemortem data are available.7 Orthodontic treatment has an impact on stability of palatal rugae so investigator should be aware of this fact when analyzing for identification reasons.