Five electronic databases were searched through May 2013 without limitations. The terms “antagonist*,” “enamel,” “wear,” and “zirconi*” were used. Titles and abstracts were initially screened, and those that fulfilled CHIR 99021 the inclusion criteria were selected for a full-text assessment. Studies
that evaluated only the material wear were not included. The database search strategy retrieved 142 potentially eligible studies. After the duplicate studies were removed, 62 studies were obtained. Titles and abstracts that fulfilled the inclusion criteria were selected for a full-text assessment (25). Seven laboratory studies met the inclusion criteria. In addition, reference lists from the finally selected studies were also screened. There was a large variation in relation to wear test method quantification, applied force, lateral movement, number and frequency of cycles, number of specimens, and enamel specimen preparation. In all studies,
enamel wear rates were lower against polished zirconia. Differences in the test methods did not allow for comparisons of wear rates among the studies. Clinical Significance: Polishing the surface is recommended for a full-contour zirconia restoration because polished zirconia presents CDK inhibitor favorable wear behavior opposing natural teeth. “
“Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of artificial accelerated aging on dimensional stability of two types of acrylic resins (thermally and chemically activated) submitted to different protocols of storage. Materials and
Methods: One hundred specimens were made using a Teflon matrix (1.5 cm × 0.5 mm) with four imprint marks, following the lost-wax casting method. The specimens were divided into ten groups, according to the type of acrylic resin, aging procedure, and storage protocol (30 days). GI: acrylic resins thermally activated, aging, storage in artificial saliva for 16 hours, distilled water for 8 hours; GII: thermal, aging, medchemexpress artificial saliva for 16 hours, dry for 8 hours; GIII: thermal, no aging, artificial saliva for 16 hours, distilled water for 8 hours, GIV: thermal, no aging, artificial saliva for 16 hours, dry for 8 hours; GV: acrylic resins chemically activated, aging, artificial saliva for 16 hours, distilled water for 8 hours; GVI: chemical, aging, artificial saliva for 16 hours, dry for 8 hours; GVII: chemical, no aging, artificial saliva for 16 hours, distilled water for 8 hours; GVIII: chemical, no aging, artificial saliva for 16 hours, dry for 8 hours GIX: thermal, dry for 24 hours; and GX: chemical, dry for 24 hours. All specimens were photographed before and after treatment, and the images were evaluated by software (UTHSCSA – Image Tool) that made distance measurements between the marks in the specimens (mm), calculating the dimensional stability. Data were submitted to statistical analysis (two-way ANOVA, Tukey test, p= 0.05).