In total,
we obtained 52 Idelalisib ic50 and 30 Equ c 1143–160-specific TCLs from allergic and non-allergic subjects, respectively (Fig. 1). When the number of Equ c 1143–160-specific TCLs was analysed per person, it was found to be similar between the subject groups [3·7 ± 0·6 (mean ± SEM) and 3·3 ± 1·1 TCLs, respectively; P > 0·05, Fisher's exact test]. However, when the Equ c 1143–160-specific TCLs that were also specific to the Equ c 1 protein (protein-specific TCLs) were analysed (30 lines from allergic and 12 from non-allergic subjects) the number of TCLs showed some tendency for difference between the groups (2·1 ± 0·6 and 1·3 ± 0·9 TCLs per person, P = 0·19; Fig. 1: black columns). When one non-allergic subject out of nine (subject Q, Fig. 1; Grubb’s test for outliers P < 0·01 = significant outlier) with an exceptionally high number of protein-specific TCLs (eight; the next largest number for a non-allergic individual was two, Fig. 1) was excluded from the analysis, the difference was statistically highly significant (0·5 ± 0·3 TCLs per non-allergic person, P < 0·001). Therefore, this finding suggests that the recognition of the naturally processed epitope from Equ c 1 by CD4+ T cells may be a distinguishing factor between the allergic patients and most of the healthy subjects. The frequency of Equ c 1143–160-specific
CD4+ T cells was estimated by the number of positive wells in the split-well cultures on 96-well plates. When a total of six million PBMCs learn more were seeded per person (30 wells, 2 × 105 PBMCs per well), assuming that each positive well represents a monoclonal T-cell growth, the mean Adenosine frequency of Equ c 1143–160-specific T cells of allergic subjects was 0·63 per 106 and that of non-allergic subjects
was 0·56 per 106 PBMCs. Presuming that a person’s PBMCs contain 30% of CD4+ T cells it can be estimated that there are approximately 2·10 per 106 and 1·85 per 106 Equ c 1143–160-specific CD4+ cells in the circulating CD4+ T-cell pool of allergic and non-allergic subjects, respectively. Extending the estimation to the CD4+ cells that were Equ c 1 protein-specific as well, the frequencies of specific cells were even lower, around 1·18 per 106 CD4+ cells for an allergic and 0·74 per 106 for a non-allergic subject. Again, if the eight protein-specific lines obtained from the non-allergic subject Q were excluded, the protein-specific CD4+ T cells were detected extremely rarely in most non-allergic subjects (0·28 per 106). We have previously observed that although T-cell responses to lipocalin allergens are weak in general,[11, 15, 17] allergen-specific TCLs from allergic subjects have stronger proliferative capacity than TCLs from non-allergic subjects.